Subject · Philosophy

Philosophy tutoring explained

A-level Philosophy is purely analytical: argument and counter-argument across epistemology, ethics, and metaphysics. AQA is the sole major provider. Strong students reconstruct philosophical arguments precisely, evaluate objections and responses, and write rigorous 25-mark essays.

Bird perched on a sage branch above a thinker statue and abstract symbols of thought

Quick reference

Levels
A-level Philosophy (no GCSE equivalent)
Awarding body
AQA, the sole major A-level Philosophy provider
Four sections
Epistemology, Moral Philosophy, Metaphysics of God, and Metaphysics of Mind
Style
Pure analytical philosophy, with argument and counter-argument throughout
Pre-A-level prep
No GCSE prerequisite; logical-reasoning aptitude matters more than prior knowledge
Common tutoring need
Argument reconstruction, objection-and-response, and 25-mark essay technique

What A-level Philosophy covers

Four sections across two papers, all part of AQA's specification (the only major A-level Philosophy spec in the UK):

Epistemology: theory of knowledge

What is knowledge? The tripartite analysis (justified true belief) and the Gettier problem. Perception (direct realism, indirect realism, and Berkeley's idealism where covered). Reason vs experience: rationalism (Descartes, Leibniz) against empiricism (Locke, Hume). And the limits of knowledge: innatism and scepticism.

Moral Philosophy: normative and meta-ethics

Normative ethical theories (utilitarianism in act and rule forms after Mill, Kantian deontology, virtue ethics after Aristotle). Applied ethics (stealing, eating animals, simulated killing, lying). Meta-ethics covering moral realism, anti-realism, naturalism, non-cognitivism, error theory, emotivism, and prescriptivism.

Metaphysics of God

The concept of God (omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenevolence; the Euthyphro problem). Arguments for God's existence: ontological (Anselm, Descartes, Plantinga's modal argument), cosmological (Aquinas's First Way, Kalam), and teleological (Paley's design argument, Hume's critique). The problem of evil in its logical and evidential forms, with theodicies (Augustinian, Hick's soul-making, free will defence). And religious language: verificationism, falsificationism, and Wittgensteinian language games.

Metaphysics of Mind

The mind-body problem (substance dualism after Descartes, property dualism, physicalism). Behaviourism (logical and analytical, Wittgenstein, Ryle). Identity theory in type and token forms. Functionalism and its critics (Block's Chinese Nation, Searle's Chinese Room). And eliminative materialism (Churchland).

What tutoring focuses on

Argument reconstruction

Philosophy mark schemes reward precise argument reconstruction: laying out an argument's premises and conclusion explicitly, identifying its logical structure, and evaluating validity and soundness. Strong students write reconstructions in numbered-premise form. Tutors drill the formal technique.

Objection-and-response dialectic

A-level Philosophy questions often ask students to evaluate whether an objection or a response succeeds. Strong essays present the objection in its strongest form, then the response in its strongest form, then a critical evaluation considering further sub-objections. Tutors coach this dialectical structure explicitly.

25-mark essay technique

The 25-mark essays are where most marks are won. Strong essays open with a clear thesis, structure paragraphs around individual arguments, cite named philosophers and specific arguments precisely, evaluate dialectically, and reach a nuanced conclusion that weighs the considered arguments. Tutors drill explicit essay frameworks.

Named-philosopher recall and citation

Mark schemes reward specific citations: not just "some philosophers argue..." but "Berkeley argues, in his Three Dialogues, that material objects exist only as ideas...". Tutors build systematic philosopher-and-argument recall.

Choosing a Philosophy tutor

A philosophy-degree background is almost essential at A-level Philosophy depth; the subject's analytical demands are too specialised for non-philosophers to coach effectively. A-level Religious Studies tutors with strong philosophy-of-religion coverage sometimes cross over, but pure Philosophy is a different commitment. Confirm the four sections, since some tutors are stronger on epistemology and metaphysics than ethics, or vice versa. Look for argument-led pedagogy: strong tutors teach by arguing, not by lecturing, and they challenge student arguments and require precise responses. For pre-PPE or pre-Philosophy applicants, tutors familiar with Oxford and Cambridge entry expectations can speak to the depth required at undergraduate interview.

Ready to find a tutor?

Free to browse, free to message. £9.99 one-off to unlock contact-sharing with one tutor.

Find a Philosophy tutor

Common questions

  • Is Philosophy hard? +

    Demanding but rewarding for the right student. The content isn't memorisation-heavy in the way History or Biology is, but the analytical demand is significant: reconstructing arguments precisely, identifying objections, weighing positions, and writing rigorously. Students who enjoy structured argument and aren't intimidated by abstract reasoning tend to thrive. Students who prefer subjects with concrete content sometimes find Philosophy frustrating.

  • How does A-level Philosophy differ from A-level Religious Studies? +

    Religious Studies' Philosophy of Religion section overlaps with A-level Philosophy's Metaphysics of God section in topics like arguments for God's existence and the problem of evil. But A-level Philosophy is broader: it covers epistemology (theory of knowledge), moral philosophy beyond religious ethics, and philosophy of mind alongside metaphysics of God. It's also more strictly analytical philosophy: focused on argument and reason, less on theological tradition.

  • How is Philosophy assessed? +

    Two written papers across the four sections. Each section has the same question structure: short-answer questions (3-mark, 5-mark) testing definitional understanding and argument identification, then 12-mark questions reconstructing and evaluating specific arguments, then 25-mark essays presenting and evaluating a major philosophical thesis. The 25-mark essays are where most marks are won or lost.

  • What does argument reconstruction involve? +

    Philosophy mark schemes reward precise reconstruction of philosophical arguments: laying out the premises and conclusion explicitly, identifying logical structure (deductive, inductive, abductive), and evaluating validity and soundness. Many students paraphrase loosely; the strongest students reconstruct arguments in numbered-premise form. Tutors drill formal argument-reconstruction technique systematically.

  • What about objections and responses? +

    A-level Philosophy questions often ask 'discuss this objection to X' or 'is response Y to objection X successful?'. Strong essays present the objection in its strongest form, present the response in its strongest form, then evaluate whether the response succeeds, typically considering further sub-objections and replies. This dialectical structure (objection, response, counter-response) is what mark schemes reward at the top end. Tutors drill it explicitly.

Related

Find a Philosophy tutor

Browse free, message tutors directly. Unlock contact-sharing with one tutor when you're ready.

Written by Robert S. Reviewed by Fiona H. Last reviewed